June 2004

Who Says It's Good to Be Alive?

Robert Quine, one of the finest guitarists of the New York City punk movement, has died of a heroin overdose at age 61.

Owing more to Lou Reed and the Velvet Underground than to the Rawk chaos of the Ramones, Stooges, or Dolls, Quine joined with peers Tom Verlaine and Richard Lloyd of Television, David Byrne of the Talking Heads, and Richard Hell (his counterpart in the the Voidoids) in bringing nervous, angular, thoughtful musicianship to the punk scene. With his balding pate, beard, sport jacket, and ever-present dark shades, he was certainly nobody's idea of a rock star. Indeed, the cerebral, almost anti-rock style Quine and his corevolutionaries pursued shows itself to be the true legacy of the New York punk scene, once you step away from the deafening buzzsaw of the Ramones. All the major bands of the era-- Blondie and the Talking Heads as well as lesser lights like Mink Deville, all owe huge credit to Quine's sound.

Although Richard Hell and the Voidoids are unfairly forgotten, remembered mainly by punk enthusiasts and then mainly for their great single "Love Comes in Spurts," Quine's career after the Voidoids ably demonstrates the breadth of his talent and influence. He made a guest appearance on Tom Waits' 1985 masterpiece "Rain Dogs," played with spiritual father Lou Reed, is largely responsible for Matthew Sweet's career, notably "Girlfriend" and "Altered Beast," and had long associations with iconoclasts Lloyd Cole and John Zorn. His spidery leads and angular attack were unmistakeable, and his tasteful contributions improved every record he appeared on.

Yet again, heroin does its rock and roll thing and kills one of the good ones.

See you in hell, Quine.

image

[wik] I should note that Quine is an Ohio native, of Akron specifically. Northeast Ohio is criminally under-appreciated as the birthplace of some great music. Chrissie Hynde, Lux Interior of the Cramps (KNIF!), DEVO, Joe Walsh, me, Rocket from the Crypt, Pere Ubu, and the Dead Boys all hail from that corner of the country. Good stuff!

[wik] Let's not forget Phil Dennison or Miz. B, wife of Buckethead either. I tell ya, Northeast Ohio has a serious talent pool.

Posted by Johno Johno on   |   § 1

In which Johno propagates yet another listy-type meme event

Perfidious crony Brdgt has a cool twist on the whole great movie list thingy.

[N]ame your favorite movie that these actors have been in. Not necessarily their best performance, just your favorite.

Some of these were rather hard, especially the really great ones and the really bad ones, you really had to focus on the film, rather than their performance.

Brdgt has some interesting choices, though unsurprisingly many overlap with mine. Here's my pix:

Sigourney Weaver: Aliens
Robin Williams: Good Will Hunting
Clint Eastwood: A Fistful of Dollars
Mel Gibson: Mad Max
Paul Newman: Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid
Brad Pitt: Fight Club
Goldie Hawn: Death Becomes Her
Audrey Hepburn: Breakfast at Tiffanys
Diane Keaton: The Godfather
Halle Berry: X-men
Kevin Bacon: Animal House
Ewan McGregor: Trainspotting
Sean Connery: Goldfinger
Anthony Hopkins: The Silence of the Lambs
Jack Nicholson: One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest
Harrison Ford: Blade Runner
Tom Hanks: Bachelor Party
Robert DeNiro: Godfather, Part II
Al Pacino: The Godfather

Brdgt is right; some of these are haaaard. How do you choose between the Sigourney Weaver picks Ghostbusters, Alien, Aliens, and Galaxy Quest? Much less the De Niro or Connery picks, or even little ol' Robin Williams, who was in The Fisher King and (yes, yes) Aladdin? Perceptive readers will notice that I chose Tom Hanks in Bachelor Party over Saving Private Ryan, Philadelphia, or Suburban Everyman Cries Again for Redemption. That's only because a donkey on 'ludes is comic genius of a rare and wonderful sort.

Posted by Johno Johno on   |   § 0

Harry Potter and the onset of puberty

I had a 1000-word post all ready to go on how good the new Harry Potter movie is when my browser crashed, taking everything with it. I lack the energy and will to recreate my masterpiece at this time, so I will just say this: 's great. Go see.

[wik]...and here it is.

Last Friday night my wife requested that we go see the new Harry Potter movie, "Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban." I'm glad she did. Even sitting in an un air-conditioned theater with a busted speaker with a drunken woman in the next row up vomiting loudly into a plastic bag every few minutes, I enjoyed "Azkaban" far more than the other Harry Potter films.

I don't know Alfonso Cuaron's previous work except by reputation. This is partly due to a self-enforced five-year moratorium on arty movies, and partly due to the fact that the only video store within walking distance of my house is totally ghetto. On Saturday I observed that they were carrying two copies of direct-to-video gorefest "Chupacabra," on DVD, the same number of copies as "Shattered Glass," the film we came to rent. Sadder yet, both copies of "Chupacabra" were out, and I was still able to rent "Shattered Glass." So, although I had heard plenty of good things about "Little Princess" and very badly want to see "Y Tu Mama Tambien" (also outnumbered by "Chupacabra," 2-zilch), I didn't know what to expect.

Cuaron reportedly didn't know much about Harry Potter when he agreed to take on the project, and that's probably a good thing. A major weakness of the first two films, directed by "Home Alone" auteur Chris Columbus, was their slavish adherence to the books they drew upon. I felt that they work okay as unified films, but didn't hang together cinematically. They were okay, even pretty good, but not up to the massive potential the source material presented.

It turns out that Cuaron was an inspired choice to direct. Eschewing Columbus' approach Cuaron and screenwriter Steve Kloves cut the material to the bone, relying on the audience already having read the books or seen the first two films. Very little is explained, and newcomers to the series will doubtless end up confused as to who is who and what is going on.

spoilers abound below the fold

On the other hand, dedicated fans of the book might object to some of Cuaron's omissions, such as the scene between Draco Malfoy and Ron Weasley in Diagon Alley, just who "Wormtail, Mooney, Padfoot, and Prongs" are, and the long arc of the relationship between Harry and Sirius Black, but these cuts are necessary if J.K. Rowling's overstuffed tale is going to make it as a film at all. Besides, we've all seen plenty of Quidditch by now, thank you very much. Mainly, Cuaron makes Rowling's story into a movie, with a film's attention to character development and pacing, using the book merely as source material, doing for Rowling what Kubrick did for Steven King with "The Shining" and Coppola did for Mario Puzo with "The Godfather."

Curaon, who is blessed with a very Mexican eye for magical realism, has also overhauled the look of the film. His Hogwarts is a warren of half-ruined courtyards and dimly lit passageways clinging to a sheer mountainside, as tortured and dangerous as his suburban London is plain. Magic is a matter of fact thing, part of life, and rather less wondrous than in Columbus' treatment. The sole exception to that is the long opening shot when we discover Harry under the covers late at night playing with his wand. (Did I mention puberty is a main theme of both the book and film?) The evil Dementors are brought to terrifying life, and Curaon employs a sort of smearing, stretching effect to the faces of people upon whom the Dementors are feeding. Cuaron also earns major points for making full use of the animated paintings on the walls of Hogwarts (with the hilarious Dawn French perfectly cast as the Fat Lady), and for making the film in general seem lived-in. Hagrid's shack, in particular, with its muddy pumpkin patch, swarms of raucous crows, and grubby interior, looks great. It's not how I pictured it when I read the book, but it just might be better. "Azkaban" was the best of the Potter books so far, and Cuaron's sets, shots, and lighting choices underscore the main themes of the story: puberty's a confusing, scary bitch of a time; and people aren't always what they seem.

One effect of the relentless trimming is that relationships between the characters unfold somewhat differently than they do in the novel. David Thewlis (last seen in Timeline, and as "renowned video artist Knox Harrington" in The Big Lebowski) plays Professor Lupin as a rumpled, sympathetic British boarding-school instructor, much as in the book, but his rage at Peter Pettigrew and his subsequent enwolfening speaks to more and darker impulses beneath the surface than Rowling suggested. Since the film can devote so little time to the character of Sirius Black and Harry's relationship with him, most of the important bonding must take place in about five minutes. Harry's feelings about his parents, ever-present in the books, fade here to the background. Since Harry's relationship with his dead parents, and their connection to the Big Evil Guy, is a central feature of the story of Harry Potter, I miss the development. But for the purposes of this film, that's just not such a big deal.

Some scenes stand out as especially remarkable. The confrontation in the Shrieking Shack pits top-flight actors against each other (David Thewlis, Gary Oldman, Alan Rickman, and Timothy Spall as the rattish Peter Pettigrew), and Cuaron just lets them do their thing. The constantly rocking set, which calls to mind the forced-perspective nightmares of "The Cabinet of Doctor Caligari," echoes the tumult between the characters. Ditto the showdown by the lake when Harry must stop the Dementors killing himself and Sirius Black. Although the acting isn't much compared to the generous use of CGI, Cuaron's handling of the FX-laden scene is lyrical, beautiful, and scary. Other nice touches were the Marauder's Map, some funny interclary scenes with the Whomping Willow, the Knight Bus (with stops called by shrunken head), and some excellent crowd actions in the Leaky Cauldron.

Emma Thompson hams it up as Divination professor Sibyl Trelawney, and her over-the-top comic turn underlines the creepiness of her one moment of actual prophesy. Michael Gambon plays Dumbledore as an avuncular aging hippie, a treatment I like better than the late Richard Harris'. The aforementioned David Thewlis and Timothy Spall are perfectly cast as Lupin and Pettigrew.

All the child actors have grown up and matured. Daniel Radcliffe and Emma Watson are great as Harry and Hermione, and even Rupert Grint has toned down the Keanu-ish mannerisms he employed in the first two films. With the onset of puberty, some characters are barely recognizable-- Matthew Lewis' Neville Longbottom is about a foot taller than before, and Jamie Waylette and Josh Herdman as Crabbe and Goyle look less imposing now that they're the same size as everyone else. Radcliffe in particular is maturing as an actor, and manages to capture Harry's conflicted inner life in glances, reactions, and understated readings. Cuaron allows the actors to hint at their characters' growing maturity, bringing out confused emotions, halting romantic advances (between Ron and Hermione), and underscoring the characters' growing realization that the world is a complicated place and not even friends will always remain who they seem to be.

While it's not easy to make the case that Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is outstanding cinema in its own right, since much of Cuaron's interpretation depends on having seen the first two films, but within the bounds of the series, Azkaban is by far the best one so far. Children's movies don't get much respect, but this one stands with The Iron Giant, Princess Mononoke, and Charlie and the Chocolate Factory as nuanced, completely entrancing tales that don't condescend to the viewer.

The only black mark against the series so far: 3 movies, 0 boobies. Get to work, people!

Posted by Johno Johno on   |   § 5

Do not look directly into sun with remaining eye.

Tomorrow night, Venus will make a transit of the Sun, the first such event in 122 years.

The most recents sets of Transits, in 1761 and 1769, and 1875 and 1882, were cause for massive scientific effort and public interest worldwide. For the 1761 show, the English Royal Society dispatched astronomers to all corners of the globe to record the exact date and time the Transit began and ended, a key step in finding the exact distance between the Earth and the Sun, and from the Sun to Venus. Among the many luminaries who made observations then were Charles Mason and Jeremiah Dixon, later famous for tracing the exact boundaries between Delaware, Maryland, and Pennsylvania, a line we know today as the "Manson-Nixon Line" separating the patrician and cultured Northern states from the toothless, slackjawed South.

The Baltimore Sun, appropriately enough, has good coverage of the event and its history.

If you are lucky enough to be a resident of Europe, Western Asia, or Africa, you will have a prime view of the entire Transit. Residents of the Eastern US will be able to catch the last few minutes of the event. Don't forget to use a pinhole camera, no. 14 welding goggles, or some other device to stave off blindness. Also, please remember not to run with scissors, always wear a sweater if it's cold out, wipe your nose, and for pete's sake, close the door! Were you born in a barn?

A final note. The Reuters news agency, who have been catching a lot of flak recently for how they spin their news stories ("Gazillions of innocent women, children, and puppies perish as US 'captures' beseiged Hussein") are at it again! Although in recent weeks the agency has run stories titled, "Venus to cross the Sun in celestial spectacular," and "Scientists Prepare for Rare Astronomical Event," Reuters staff writer Patricia Reaney helpfully reminds us that the Sun is not our friend with the pre-Transit filing, "Venus crossing of Sun could harm eyes." The only thing that could make this better would be for FOX News to run a story titled, "Solar system mourns passing of Reagan; Venus is the tears of the Sun."

Posted by Johno Johno on   |   § 1

I guess it's sort of a serial...

From Crescat Sententia

At Books-a-Million tonight (no, I don't normally go there, but it was next to the wine store), I could not find a copy of The Federalist Papers, though I searched in American politics, philosophy, and the other likely categories. When I asked the store clerk where I'd find it, he said, "Oh, I shelved that yesterday. It's in fiction."

what?

"It's in fiction and literature. It's been declared a classic."

[continued look of skepticism]

"I agree it makes no sense, but that's where it is."

[figures the guy has to shelve things where he's told to shelve them]

Posted by Johno Johno on   |   § 0

Half a (cheaply made) loaf

Wal-Mart is making changes to its employee policies, starting with a half-assed attempt to hire a few women in management roles. The article is sketchy on details, but this seems like Wal-Mart are pursuing pretty much half a solution to one part of their many problems.

These small concessions nothing compared to what a wildcat strike would accomplish (to the barricades! *sings* "Arise ye workers from your slumbers, arise ye prisoners of want!") Except, of course, that hourly retail employees aren't unionized and the labor movement of the 20th century has done its job and is now guarding its gains, at least where it's not run by crooks.
Even if that weren't the case the old-school labor movement cannot address the needs of today's service workers, who are more replaceable, economically marginal, and diffuse than ever before.

Well, it's good to know that in the absence of a labor advocacy group working on behalf of retail and service employees, a good old publicly humiliating corporate auto-da-fe can make things happen.

Posted by Johno Johno on   |   § 0

Tragedy

Creed have broken up, and the band's members are starting new projects. At least two albums by Creed alumni are due out by the end of the year.

The tragedy of cancer is if you don't kill it, it will eventually metastasize. Then you're really screwed.

Posted by Johno Johno on   |   § 0

We have a winner!

This week's winner of the infrequently awarded Perfidious Prize For Inadvertant or Vertant Asshattery goes to...

Mr. Tauhidul Chaudhury of Bangladesh, who ran up a $129,696 bill at New York strip club Scores last October. (The Smoking Gun, of course, has the story.)

That's not the asshattery, though anyone who runs up a $130K bar bill in one night has it in him to achieve such. The asshattery is this: he's suing Scores, claiming that he never authorized those charges on his credit cards. Too bad his signature is on them, or he'd almost have a case! Who wants to bet that he's got a wife at home in Dhaka, and that she's a bit peeved? Moreover, everyone knows that New York City strip bars are a total scam. Rudy's blue laws mandate pasties on all the dancers (tho' who knows what goes on in the private rooms), and most of the dirrty is mitigated by Scores' popularity, size, and adjacence to the newly enDisneyed and Viacommed Times Square. Mr. Chaudhury and his $130K would have had a much sleazier time at some no-name place in Yonkers, or so I hear.

So, Mr. Tauhidul Chaudhury of Bangladesh, you are our winner! Wear it with pride, asshat!

PS. Dude, you probably should have figured this out before dropping $130,000 learning it the hard way: There is absolutely, positively, NO SEX IN THE CHAMPAGNE ROOM.

Posted by Johno Johno on   |   § 3

*sings* This is how we do it, baby (this is how we do'wet)

Can anyone tell me if the above referenced song from the early 1990s was New Edition, Boyz II Men, or Bell Biv Devoe? Bless my heart, I can't remember!

Check out Spirit of America, a nonprofit organization whose mission is

to expand the abilities of Americans serving abroad to improve the quality of life of people at the grass roots level. Our objectives are to:
• Increase the reach, scale and impact of the informal humanitarian activities that take place on the front lines in troubled regions.
• Contribute charitable goods that can have a positive, practical and timely impact in the local communities where American personnel are involved.
• Improve foreign perceptions of the American people and our presence abroad.

When I harp over and over on the importance of winning the "hearts and minds" of the people we libervade (not to mention the people we just sell stuff to), this is just what I'm talking about. Better yet, blogger "Armed Liberal" of Begging to Differ is their new COO. Sweet! (and good luck to him.)

Last week I was at a wedding where all the bridesmaids exchanged their silk shoes for flip-flops at the reception. The kicker is that the flip-flops light up when you walk. There's a little capacitor or something in the sole that converts kinetic energy into electricity and causes an array of LEDs in the strap to flash in random patterns of purple, pink and white with each step. My wife was in the wedding party; she got a pair. In addition to being super-fun, they're also mad comfortable. They were $7 at Wal-Mart.

Can you imagine what a US Marine could do with 100 pairs of child-sized self-powered light-up flip flops in Iraq?

Posted by Johno Johno on   |   § 2

My fifteen minutes in which to rock and roll

Wish me luck. I'm off with two friends to play a 20-minute live set which will represent my first appearance on a rock stage in almost exactly ten years. I'm on bass, we don't know what exactly we're going to play, and tonight and tonight only we are under the moniker "Tonight We Hunt And Kill Crispin Glover." Our one finished song is an instrumental called "I Am Your Density."

Accolades to the first reader who can tell me what these two titles have to do with one another.

We're gonna rip their lungs out. It's gonna be that good. Bad. Good. Definitely good.

[wik] ...and accolades go to the pseudonymous "Edward Van Halen" for accurately identifying "Back to the Future" as the unifying theme.

It went okay. It was definitely a fun fifteen minutes, and it was good to play in front of people. I only have two things to bitch about, which is about twelve less than usual. First: I hate, hate Hartke amplifiers. They're the leading bass amp maker, and they suck. I play an early-'70s Fender Jazz Bass, which like its cousin the Stratocaster guitar, is a versatile, clean-sounding instrument. The trouble is, much like the Strat, getting a good sound has partly to do with what amp you pair it with. Hartkes, especially the high-end heads/cabinets like I played through last night, have a very clean, clear, even brittle sound to them that's great for the studio but doesn't do it for me. Even though the head had dual-channel many-frequency eq's and high- and low- bandpass, the best I could do was a sound that was round and low, but still sort of shiny and tanky. That's what you get from putting a clean-sounding bass with a clean-sounding amp.

Non-bass players won't get this, but when you bear down on an electric bass, especially one of the classic models, you get a different attack to what you play that's a bit metallic. Flea from the Red Hot Chili Peppers makes great use of this sound. However, through a Hartke, this sound can never be more than mannered and polished. I prefer a fuzzier, less trebly sound like you can get from Fender Bassman or a Gallien-Krueger. So the sound was a bit of a drag.

Also, I'd forgotten how hard it is to hear in a live setting. Even with just three instruments and no vocals, if you don't have a monitor system to go by, trying to get a tight groove in a room that's new to you is like trying to drive a car blindfolded. Deeply frustrating.

But what the hell. I'll do it again. I'm married, so I no longer have to worry about getting chicks, and I have a job so I don't have to worry about doing it for money. I answer to a higher power now: ROCK.

Posted by Johno Johno on   |   § 9

Failing upward

Bernard Law, otherwise known as Cardinal Bernard Law of Boston, Protector of Babytouchers, has been reassigned by the Pope. I'm not Catholic, not by a long shot, so I don't pretend to know too much of how the church works traditionally. I do know that the priesthood takes care of its own, but even so it seems wrong that a man who is largely responsible for covering up and perpetuating a widespread and decades-long child abuse crisis, who knowingly allowed children to be put in danger of abuse time and again, is now being rewarded with the "archpriest[hood] of St. Mary Major Basilica," one of "'the four most important basilicas' in Rome," with a probable "10,000 euro monthly stipend, or about $12,000," a post which is "also likely to make Cardinal Law one of the most influential Americans in the Vatican."

I don't mean to malign the Catholic church. This just doesn't make a bit of sense to me. Why give Law a Roman sinecure and the Pope's ear, instead of putting him quietly to pasture somewhere out of the way?

Posted by Johno Johno on   |   § 3

What do we believe in? Ahh.... what day is it again?

Ken of Oldsmoblogger notes that the Reform Party has picked whom they will endorse this election cycle.... Drum roll.... Ralph Nader.

Ken astutely asks, "[c]an a party that will nominate Ross Perot, Pat Buchanan, and Ralph Nader for the highest office in the land--in consecutive elections--possibly stand for anything? Beyond, that is, getting enough votes to preserve ballot access, get media play, and maybe qualify for federal matching funds?"

Well?

Posted by Johno Johno on   |   § 1

The second coming... of Al Haig

Somebody forgot to tell John Ashcroft that he's not in charge here. The same group he claimed was going to attack the US soon-- soon!, the Abu Hafs al-Masri Brigades, are the same defunct band of jokers who "claimed responsibility for the power blackout in the Northeast last year, a power outage in London and the Madrid bombing. None of the claims was found to be credible."

Hat tip to Norbizness.

Posted by Johno Johno on   |   § 0

I'm sure the job was its own reward.

Via Instapundit, I see that CIA Director George Tenet has resigned. I would rather have seen his ass fired, and about two years ago, but hey... what's a couple dozen months when national security is at stake?

[wik] Patton is all over this like a fat boy on pie.

The internecine battle between the screwball peace-niks at the State Department and CIA, on one side, and the Pentagon and White House on the other has finally boiled over. The pivot point appears to be Chalabi, and all of the (so far unsubstantiated and prima facie silly) allegations of his being an Iranian agent. State and CIA have been leaking like sieves on the story, with the apparent intent of embarrassing the President and Pentagon.

If the next personnel action is a high-level departure at State, I'll claim victory here. And if no other high-level departures occur at either CIA or State, I'll likely have been incorrect.

Posted by Johno Johno on   |   § 6

All Hail the God of Walks

If you've read Michael Lewis' modern baseball classic, "Moneyball," you will remember a kid named Kevin Youkilis, a beefy, slowfooted John Kruk-type "ballplayer not athelete" third baseman with an unnatural ability to draw walks. If you haven't read Michael Lewis' modern baseball classic, "Moneyball," well, you should, and do please reread the previous sentence because it contains information you need to know.

Youkilis appears in Lewis' book because he doesn't fit the mold of the sterotypical great ballplayer, the Alex Rodriguez five-tool wonder. Instead, he is a slow, slap-hitting tub of lard. The clincher is that despite his average abilities and physique, he's a preternaturally patient hitter, a Sabremetrician's dream. His on-base percentage in the minor leagues has been astronomical, mainly due to his ability to work pitchers deep in the count to draw walks-- indeed, in "Moneyball" he is dubbed "Euclis, the Greek God of Walks." In the newfangled thinkery of the Boston Red Sox' management, the tubby God of Walks is more valuable than a hacker who swings for power and strikes out frequently. After all, a player on base can score a run, and a player who strikes out has wasted one of only twenty-seven chances per game the team has to score that same run.

With Boston Red Sox third baseman Bill Mueller injured, Youkilis has finally made his major league debut. In twelve games with the Sox, he has posted an OBP of .442 and walked 9 times. Although he has also struck out twelve times in that same span, a period of adjustment to major league pitching is to be expected. Even given Youk's need to adjust to the majors, his .442 OBP compares favorably to such marquee on-base generators as Todd Helton (career .427, first year .337), Barry Bonds (career .436, first year .330), and model leadoff man Rickey Henderson (career .401, first year .338). Put another way, Kevin Youkilis in his first year is getting on base more often than Barry Bonds, one of the all-time elite offensive players, has done in 11 out of his 17 seasons. Not bad.

Can we expect Bonds-like numbers all around from the God of Walks? No. Like I said, he's a beefy, slowfooted heir to John Kruk's mantle. But the God of Walks is an eternal journeyman of a type I always have a lot of fun watching. Now that Krukker's out of the game, Rickey Henderson is playing minor-league ball in Newark, and Joe Randa is in exile in Kansas City, we need Youk. Welcome to the show, kid.

Glossary for non-baseball types:

Walk: A hitter earns a free walk to first base if a pitcher throws four "balls," or pitches outside the strike zone (defined by the left and right edges of home plate, the player's knees, and the midpoint between the belt and the top of the shoulders) that the hitter does not swing at.
Batting Average: Actually a ratio, of the number of successful at-bats producing a hit to the total number of at-bats the player sees. A BA of .300 is considered good, meaning that a good baseball player will fail more than two-thirds of the time. Baseball is a hard game.
At-bat: From Wikipedia: An at-bat (AB) is used to calculate other data such as batting average. A player has an at bat every time he comes to bat except under the following circumstances:

  • He receives a base on balls (BB).
  • He is hit by pitch (HBP).
  • He hits a sacrifice fly or a sacrifice bunt (a "sacrifice" meaning the batter allows himself to be put out, advancing other baserunners one base).
  • He is awarded first base due to interference or obstruction.
  • The inning ends while he is still at bat (due to the third out being made by a runner caught stealing, for example)
    OBP: On-base percentage. Describes how often a player reaches base, derived by adding a player's batting average to the number of times he walks, and dividing both by overall plate appearances. An OBP of about .330 is average.
    OPS: On-base percentage plus slugging. Considered by some the most useful shorthand measure of offensive merit. Derived by adding a player's OBP to his Slugging Percentage. Slugging Percentage is a ratio describing how frequently a player hits for extra bases (doubles, triples, or home runs). Elite players have an OPS of at least .750. Barry Bonds' OPS since 2000 has been 1.366.
    Five-tool player: The proverbial everything man. A player who can hit for power, hit for percentage, steal bases, field well, and throw hard and accurately. Traditionally considered the perfect player. New-school managers such as Billy Beane of Oakland and Theo Epstein of Boston put less value on five-tool players, choosing to emphasize other traits that are currently undervalued in the player salary market.
    Sabremetrics: A statistical method for analyzing baseball. Name derived from SABR, for the Society for American Baseball Research. See the Wikipedia definition.
    Baseball: The most perfect of all possible games, set free of time, history, and space, in this, the most perfect of all possible worlds. You can keeps your nasssssty rounders and cricket, preciousss!
  • Posted by Johno Johno on   |   § 4